Legal Opinion

Scurfield v. Federal Laboratories, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1939No. Appeal, 245PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Schaffer,

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered against him in pursuance of defendant’s affidavit of defense raising questions of law. The action is in trespass for personal injuries and the circumstances out of which it grows somewhat unique. The injur/ to plaintiff was inflicted more than nine years ago, on December 19, 1929. Suit was not brought until a few days before the statute of limitations had run.

The statement of claim alleged that defendant is the manufacturer of a so-called tear gas gun, so made as to resemble a fountain pen. It sold one of them to Daniel…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Scalise v. F. M. Venzie Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Catani v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Rozumailski v. Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Jacob v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Kuhns v. BruggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Dyson v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Dahlstrom v. ShrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. McLaughlin v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Harford Mutual Insurance v. MoorheadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API