Gordon v. S. M. Byers Motor Car Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Linn,
The verdict was against both defendants, Hazlett and the Byers Company, who were charged as joint tortfeasors : Act of June 29, 1923, P. L. 981. It establishes that the death of plaintiff’s husband resulted from the negligence of Lewis, the driver of the truck. The point in the case is, who is responsible for Lewis’s conduct— Hazlett, or the Byers Company, or both; whose servant or agent was he in doing the acts* that resulted in the explosion? The answer depends on whether either or both retained the power of controlling * the work that caused the damage. On…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Denton v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sgattone v. Mulholland & Gotwals, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Simonton v. MortonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Byrne v. Henry A. Hitner's Sons Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Persing v. Citizens Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- LeJeune v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Siidekum v. Animal Rescue League of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Koontz v. Messer & Quaker State Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Grasberger v. Liebert & Obert, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Volb v. G.E. Capital Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.