Legal Opinion
State v. Antionieta Carmaco
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided October 3, 2006No. 14-05-00900-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAURICE AMIDEI, Senior Justice.
Appellee pled not guilty to the offense of violating Section XXII(a)(12) of the Harris County Regulations for Sexually Oriented Businesses In the Unincorporated Area of Harris County, Texas. Following a hearing, the trial judge granted appel-lee’s Motion to Quash the Information and found the Regulation unconstitutionally vague.
I. Background
This appeal seeks to reverse the trial court’s order quashing the Information and to reinstate the Information. No evidence was offered during the hearing on appellee’s Motion to Quash, but the probable cause statement…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. MoffCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Duncantell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
- Ex parte FloresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Bruce Alan McMillian v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
- KFOURI v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
- State v. Ashley Beth Gammill, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.