State v. Moff
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · MeyersMeyers, J.
in which KELLER, P.J., and WOMACK, JOHNSON, KEASLER, HERVEY, HOLCOMB, and COCHRAN, JJ., join.
The Appellee, Moff, was charged with intentional, knowing and reckless misapplication of fiduciary property. Tex. Pen. Code § 32.45(b). The indictment submitted by the district attorney failed to specify the transaction or transactions involved. Moff filed a motion to quash the indictment, which was granted by the trial court. The trial court’s order directed the State to re-file the indictment, specifying which purchases were alleged to be unauthorized. The State appealed, and the Court of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- American Plant Food Corporation v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Daniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by562 opinions
- State of Texas v. Wilson, Carolyn Sue KrizanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Lawrence v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Mungin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- State v. BarbernellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
557 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.