Legal Opinion
Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 3, 1994No. C2-93-54PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GRAHAM, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc., seeks a declaratory judgment pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202, to clarify its obligations, if any, under an order of the Industrial Commission of Ohio (“the Commission”), defendant herein, issued on May 8, 1992 in Ohio Worker’s Compensation Claim No. 89-15905. Plaintiff invokes this court’s jurisdiction under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., and the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”), as amended by the Labor…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bassiri v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Hite v. Biomet, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1999
- McMahon v. Digital Equipment Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
- McMahon v. Digital Equipment Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Bassiri v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.