Legal Opinion

McMahon v. Digital Equipment Corp.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 17, 1998No. Civil Action 95-12671-MLWPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDERS ON MOTIONS OF DEFENDANTS PURSUANT TO RULE 56(b), FED. R. CIV. P., FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (## 70, 72)

COLLINGS, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. Introduction

Presently before the Court for resolution are the defendants Digital Equipment Corporation (“DEC”), Plan Administrator of Digital Equipment Corporation Accident and Sickness Plan (“the Administrator”), and CORE, Inc.’s (“CORE”) motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff Carolyn E. McMahon (“McMahon”) has asked the Court to strike certain exhibits submitted by the defendants in support of their motions. Likewise, CORE has…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Langley v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
  2. Beegan v. Associated PressDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1999
  3. Bekiroglu v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
  4. Nieves Ayala v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2002
  5. Duckett v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of AlabamaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API