Legal Opinion
Falker v. Chrysler Corp.
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided April 15, 1983PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
William D. Friedmann, J.
Plaintiff, an attorney appearing pro se, brought this small claims action seeking “$1,500.00 — May 4, 1981. Defective engine serial #8005, Loss of Use” (should be No. 3305).
CONTENTIONS
He contends that the boat engine, because of its defective design and assembly, from the time of purchase, would not operate at full power and flooded regularly. That the double warranties of section 2-314 (subd [2], par [c]) (implied warranty; merchantability; usage of trade) and section 2-315 (implied warranty; fitness for particular purpose) of the Uniform…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Codling v. PagliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Martin v. Julius Dierck Equipment Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Hole v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Ziehm v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Mendelson v. General Motors Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Johnson v. Nissan North America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Weiner v. Tel Aviv Car & Limousine Service, Ltd.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1988
- Dugan & Meyers Construction Co., Inc. And the Goettle Co. v. Worthington Pump Corporation (Usa)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Nabisco Brands, Inc. v. General Restoration Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1988
- Dugan & Meyers Construction Co., Inc. And the Goettle Co. v. Worthington Pump Corporation (Usa)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.