Legal Opinion

Dugan & Meyers Construction Co., Inc. And the Goettle Co. v. Worthington Pump Corporation (Usa)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 26, 1984No. 83-3525PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COHN, District Judge.

I

This is a breach of contract case. On April 20, 1983 the district court, following a bench trial, entered a judgment against defendant Worthington Pump Corporation (USA) (Worthington) for $424,625.24 in fa*1168vor of plaintiffs Dugan and Meyers Construction Co., Inc. (Dugan & Meyers) and The Goettle Co., (Goettle), for the damages it found they suffered because of the failure of the mixed liquor pumping system at the Little Miami Waste Water Treatment Plant (the Plant) operated by the Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater Cincinnati (the District).

E.C.I. Company (E.C.I.), a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Bilotta v. Kelley Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Inglis v. American Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Cordovan Associates, Incorporated v. Dayton Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Step-Saver Data Systems, Inc. v. Wyse Technology and the Software Link, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  2. Rayco Manufacturing, Inc. v. Deutz CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
  3. Dugan & Meyers Construction Co., Inc. And the Goettle Co. v. Worthington Pump Corporation (Usa)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  4. Marianas Public Land Trust v. Government of the Northern Mariana IslandsDistrict Court, Northern Mariana Islands · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API