Ziehm v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment reversed on the-law and facts, without- costs of this appeal to either party, and a new trial granted. Memorandum: The traffic signs involved in this action were confusing, improperly worded, improperly located,, insufficient in height, insufficient in number, not refleetorized or improperly refleetorized, misleading, and an invitation to disaster in the night time, under the peculiar conditions surrounding the intersection, to the most prudent driver of a motor vehicle travel-ling southerly on Transit Road. The State made no tests, prior to the accident, as to the adequacy of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Collentine v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Miller v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Leboeuf v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- LeBoeuf v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1938
- LeBoeuf v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Canepa v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Neddo v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1948
- Laitenberger v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1947
- Humphrey v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Nuss v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1949
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.