Legal Opinion
GTI CORPORATION v. Calhoon
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided November 28, 1969No. 68-207PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, JUDGMENT
WEINMAN, Chief Judge.
The Court, having considered the evi.dence presented at the trial of this action and. the briefs and arguments of counsel,, makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Plaintiff GTI Corporation (“GTI”) is a Rhode Island Corporation with it? principal place of business at Meadville, Pennsylvania. Defendants Calhoon, King and Davis are individuals residing in.Nelsonville, Ohio and defendant Metpar Manufacturing, Inc. is an Ohio Corporation with its principal place of business at Nelsonville,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Franke v. WiltschekCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- E. W. Bliss Company v. Struthers-Dunn, Inc., P. G. Bartlett, L. K. Clark, D. E. Henry and J. A. DingesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. v. Audio Devices, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1958
- Briggs v. ButlerOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co. v. Continental Aviation & Engineering Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Basic Chemicals, Inc. v. BensonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- Valco Cincinnati, Inc. v. N & D Machining Service, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. CiavattaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Wiebold Studio, Inc. v. Old World Restorations, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1985
- Hoover Transportation Services Inc. v. FryeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.