Legal Opinion

Klein v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 13, 1931No. 387PublishedCited by 241 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland

The petitioners are the sole surviving heirs of Solomon Klein and distributees of his estate. He died intestate, leaving among other property, two parcels of land in Cook County, Illinois, which, some fifteen months prior to his death, he had conveyed to his wife, Etta M. Klein, by deed, the habendum clauses of which are as follows:

“ First. To have and to hold the said lands unto the said grantee for and during the term of her natural life, and if she shall die prior to the decease of said grantor then and in that event she shall by virtue hereof take no greater or other estate in said lands…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nichols v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Tyler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Haward v. PeaveyIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Baley v. StrahanIllinois Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by241 opinions

  1. Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Commissioner v. Estate of ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Porter v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Helvering v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. RothensiesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

236 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API