Legal Opinion

Estate of Spiegel v. Commissioner

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 17, 1949No. 3PublishedCited by 162 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

This is a federal estate tax controversy. Here, as in Commissioner v. Church, ante, p. 632, we granted cer-tiorari to consider questions dependent upon the meaning and application of a provision of § 811 (c) of the Internal Revenue Code. 47 Stat. 169, 279, as amended, 26 U. S. C. §811 (c). The particular provision requires including in a decedent’s gross estate the value at his death of all property “To the extent of any interest therein of which the decedent has at any time made a transfer, by trust or otherwise . . . intended to take effect in possession or enjoyment at or after his death

In…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Reinecke v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Helvering v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by162 opinions

  1. Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Propper v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. The Tungus v. SkovgaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. United States v. ByrumSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. Durham Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960

157 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API