Legal Opinion

City of Jacksonville v. Bankers Life Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 8, 1937No. 6036PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Appellees, holders of special assessment bonds issued by appellant as a municipal corporation, brought suit in equity, charging that the city had collected some $95,000, paid in advance upon deferred installments in the special assessment proceedings, had failed to call bonds for redemption out of the same and had illegally diverted and lost said moneys. Appellees prayed that they be awarded an accounting with respect to the collection and diversion of said funds and that they have money judgments pro rata, against the city for the amounts diverted. In an amendment…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Rothschild v. Village of Calumet ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Conway v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. People ex rel. McCullough v. Deutsche Evangelisch Lutherische Jehovah Gemeinde Ungeaenderter Augsburgischer ConfessionIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Moore v. City of NampaSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Citizens Banking Co. v. Monticello State BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  2. In Re Estate of WilkeningAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  3. Village of Brookfield v. PentisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  4. Getz v. City of HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  5. Mott v. City of FloraDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API