Legal Opinion

Moore v. City of Nampa

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 9, 1928No. 384PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

Petitioner sued in the United States court for the district of Idaho to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of respondent’s negligence and false representations in respect of certain local improvement bonds. Respondent demurred to the complaint; the district court held that it failed to state a cause of action and dismissed the case. The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. 18 F. (2d) 860. ' The petition to this Court for a writ of certiorari stated that the decision below conflicts with the decisions of this Court and of the Circuit Courts of Appeals for the Third and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States Mortgage Co. v. SperrySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. City of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  3. Peake v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. City of Mankato v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  5. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. City of HarrisburgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Tranter v. Alleghency County Co. AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Brazos River Authority v. CarrTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State Ex Rel. Southern Surety Co. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Munro v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Bryant v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API