Legal Opinion
Olympus Spa v. Armstrong
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 29, 2025No. 23-4031PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OLYMPUS SPA; MYOON WOON No. 23-4031 LEE; SUN LEE; JANE DOE, patron; D.C. No. JANE DOES, employees 1-3, 2:22-cv-00340- BJR Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. OPINION ANDRETA ARMSTRONG, Executive Director of the Washington State Human Rights Commission; MADISON IMIOLA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Barbara Jacobs Rothstein, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted November 18, 2024 Seattle, Washington Filed May 29, 2025 Before: M. Margaret McKeown,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Olympus Spa v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026
- Uber Technologies, Inc. v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026