Legal Opinion
Uber Technologies, Inc. v. City of Seattle
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 4, 2026No. 25-228Published
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; No. 25-228 PORTIER, LLC, D.C. No. 2:24-cv-02103- Plaintiffs - Appellants, MJP and OPINION MAPLEBEAR INC., doing business as Instacart, Intervenor-Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SEATTLE, Defendant - Appellee. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., No. 25-231 PORTIER, LLC, D.C. No. 2:24-cv-02103- Plaintiffs, MJP and MAPLEBEAR INC., doing business as Instacart, 2 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. CITY OF SEATTLE Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF SEATTLE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.