Legal Opinion

Olympus Spa v. Armstrong

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 12, 2026No. 23-4031Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 12 2026 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OLYMPUS SPA; et al., No. 23-4031 D.C. No. Plaintiffs - Appellants, 2:22-cv-00340-BJR Western District of Washington, v. Seattle ANDRETA ARMSTRONG, Executive ORDER AND AMENDED Director of the Washington State Human OPINION Rights Commission and MADISON IMIOLA, Defendants - Appellees. Before: McKEOWN, GOULD, and LEE, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge MCKEOWN Dissent by Judge LEE Statement Respecting the Denial of Rehearing En Banc by Judge MCKEOWN Additional…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API