Legal Opinion

Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Dees

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 20, 1914No. 3623PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from District Court, Garvin County; Action by Uou Dees and others against the Gulf, Colorado & Santa Ee Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

As plaintiff below, Mrs. Eou Dees sued the railway company for the alleged negligent injury of her husband which resulted in his death. The injury occurred at the town of Davis, Okla., where the defendant railway runs north and south through the western portion of the town. Main street runs east and west across the tracks about 25 feet north of the depot, which is situated on the east side of the main line of the road. The stock pens are situated 300 or 400 feet south-wardly from the depot, and on the west side of the main line. Besides the main line of track, there are…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hudson v. Wabash Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. BeggsIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PinchinIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Bailey v. North Carolina R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. WolfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Gypsy Oil Co. v. GinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Kansas City Southern R. Co. v. LangleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Papich v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  5. Southern Pac. Co. v. BolenArizona Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API