Legal Opinion

Woodland Furniture, LLC v. Larsen

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 2005No. 30977PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Justice.

The appellant, Woodland Furniture, LLC (Woodland), appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment against it on all claims it made against the respondents, Richard Larsen and Heirloom Reflections, LLC (collectively referred to as Heirloom). Woodland’s claims involve the federal Lanham Act, an Idaho unfair competition statute, and common law unfair competition. This appeal raises interesting legal issues relating to protectible trade dress, unfair competition and federal preemption, and we agree with the district court’s legal analysis and affirm summary judgment for…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wesco Autobody Supply, Inc. v. ErnestIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Columbia River Mining Supplies LLC v. Colter Young Consulting & DesignDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2023
  3. WESCO Autobody Supply, Inc. v. Holly ErnestIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Wesco Autobody Supply, Inc. v. ErnestIdaho Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API