Legal Opinion
Town of Hardwick v. Town of Barnard
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 9, 1930PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.
T.his is an action under G. L. 4219, as amendedby No. 112, Acts 1921, to recover the expense incurred in providing for the care, maintenance, and support of James Learie, Sr., an alleged pauper. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff upon an agreed statement of facts. The defendant excepted.
There are eight exceptions to the judgment, but, as the defendant says in its brief, they all involve, directly or indirectly, only one point, and that is the claim that the agreed statement does not make it to appear that James Learie, Sr., was a poor person in need of assistance. This was requisite to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In re Consolidated Rendering Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1907
- Hooper, Tr. in Bankruptcy v. KennedySupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- Town of Ripton v. Town of BrandonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1907
- City of Barre v. Town of BethelSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
- Drew v. BowenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Town of Manchester v. Town of TownshendSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- Nadeau v. MarchessaultSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
- Peabody v. Town of HollandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
- Town of Marshfield v. Town of CabotSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
- Town of Barton v. Town of AlbanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.