Legal Opinion

Peabody v. Town of Holland

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 7, 1935PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, C. J.

The plaintiff, a practicing physician and surgeon, seeks to recover by this action of contract, for professional services rendered to Joseph Archambault, an alleged poor person in need of such assistance. The complaint is in the form of general assumpsit, and the answer is a general denial. The trial below was by court in the Orleans municipal court. Upon facts found and filed, judgment was rendered for the plaintiff, and the defendant excepted.

It is found that Archambault, who had lived with his wife in the defendant town for about two years, on July 28, 1931, while at work for George…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Town of Barnet v. Town of NortonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  2. St. Albans Hospital v. City of St. AlbansSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
  3. Town of Ripton v. Town of BrandonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1907
  4. Town of Waitsfield v. Town of CraftsburySupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  5. Town of Cabot v. Town of St. JohnsburySupreme Court of Vermont · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. County of Alameda v. JanssenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Town of Manchester v. Town of TownshendSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  3. Nadeau v. MarchessaultSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
  4. City of Montpelier v. Town of CalaisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1944
  5. Destitute of Bennington County v. HENRY W. PUTNAM MHSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API