Legal Opinion

Drew v. Bowen

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 11, 1929PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

The plaintiff, as stakeholder, had in his hands $500, which was claimed by both Bowen and Draper, defendants. He brought a bill of interpleader against them and H. A. Gil-man. The latter was defaulted, and Bowen and Draper were ordered to interplead and did so. The fund was paid into court, where it awaits the decision as to its ownership. The court below, acting on an agreed statement of facts, awarded the money to Draper. Bowen appealed.

It appears that Draper, on the 25th day of May, 1926, being then in possession of a certain farm and the personal property thereon, in Richford, entered…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ankeny v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Burks v. DaviesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hanson v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Clark v. Estate of ConroeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1866
  5. Crim v. UmbsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gillis v. Bonelli-Adams Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Grand Lodge of Vermont F. & A. M. v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  3. Record v. KempeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  4. Record v. KempeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. Nichols v. Nichols, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API