Legal Opinion
City of Barre v. Town of Bethel
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided March 13, 1929PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWatson, C. J.
This case stands on an agreed statement of facts. It is said in Mathie v. Hancock, 78 Vt. 414, 63 Atl. 143, and in Chittenden County Trust Co. v. Hurd, Jr. et al., 93 Vt. 71, 106 Atl. 564, and in City of Barre v. Barre & Chelsea R. R. Co., 97 Vt. 398, 123 Atl. 427, 37 A. L. R. 207, that in such circumstances the case must be determined on the facts appearing as so established, for no inference can be drawn by the court from any of such facts. Lest the legal effect of the rule as stated above may be misunderstood, we state it with greater precision in Hooper, Trustee v. Kennedy, 100 Vt. 314,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Old Colony Railroad v. WilderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- State ex rel. Phelps v. JacksonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1907
- Laird v. PerrySupreme Court of Vermont · 1902
- Mathie v. HancockSupreme Court of Vermont · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Moran v. Fifteenth Ward B. L. Assn.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
- Town of Georgia v. Town of WatervilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
- Grand Lodge of Vermont F. & A. M. v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
- Drew v. BowenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
- Roberge v. Town of TroySupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.