Kintner v. Atlantic Communication Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
In Equity. Suits by Samuel M. Kintner and Halsey M. Barrett, receivers of the National Electric Signaling Company, against the Atlantic Communication Company and others, and by the Marconi Wireless Telegraph Company against the Atlantic Communication Company, Incorporated. For brevity the parties will be referred to as Marconi, Nesco, and Atlantic.
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
In the opinion of the court filed on March 4, 1921, it was pointed out that further testimony was desired in order to aid the court in the solution of the problem of apportioning profits derived from sending from and receiving radio messages from and at Sayville.
Receiving Profits.--The testimony called for was confined to a consideration of the respective and relative merits of the following: (1) Fleming patent, No. 803,684; (2) Fessenden patents, No. 1,050,441 and 1,050,728; (3) DeP'órest patents, Nos. 841,387 and"879,532; (4) Armstrong patent, No. 1,113,149; and (5) the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. v. De Forest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. of America v. De Forest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1916
- Kintner v. Atlantic Communication Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917
- Kintner v. Atlantic Communication Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917
- Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. of America v. De Forest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1919
3Cited by5 opinions
- American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. New York Rys. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1922
- Carson v. American Smelting & Refining Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1928
- Enterprise Mfg. Co. v. Shakespeare Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1942
- National Electric Signaling Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
- National Electric Signaling Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933