Legal Opinion

Carson v. American Smelting & Refining Co.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 18, 1928No. 144PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

In response to an order of the master in chancery to file a detailed statement of account in form of' debtor and creditor under equity rules 62 and 63, showing profits accrued to the defendant from the patent infringement, the defendant filed a statement purporting to show expenses by use of infringing furnaces in its several plants and expenses in use of four other types of furnaces which, it claims, were open to defendant’s use and each capable of producing the same result, and which, it assorted, are proper* standards of comparison, showing gain by saving from the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. Minnesota Moline Plow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Wagner Electric & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Sessions v. RomadkaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davilla v. Brunswick-Balke Collender Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  2. (HC) Sanford v. McVayDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API