Legal Opinion
Autozone Development Corp. v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 29, 2007No. Civil Action No.: 05-0476 (RMU)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss 1
URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiffs, Autozone Development Corporation and Autozone Stores, Inc., bring suit against the District of Columbia, the National Capital Revitalization Corporation (“NCRC”), and Naylor Road, LLC (“Naylor Road”) (collectively, “the defendants”) for allegedly violating the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. The defendants 2 move to dismiss, contending that the plaintiffs lack standing to bring this suit because they can show no injury in fact. In response, the plaintiffs argue that they…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Koutny v. MartinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Franco v. National Capital Revitalization Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Jack's Canoes & Kayaks, LLC v. National Park ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Unity08 v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Aleida Miranda v. American National Red CrossDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.