Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Doyle,
Before this Court are a petition for review by The Baltimore and Ohio Roalroad Company (B & 0) from a decision and order of the Public Utility Commission (PUC) and a motion to quash said petition by the PUC.
*383On July 14, 1981, the PUC entered a decision and order approving an application filed by Upper Chichester Township to alter a crossing where Carpenter Road intersects the B & O’s tracks. The order required, inter alia, B & 0 to bear both fifty percent of the cost of widening the crossing and fifty percent of any costs incurred by Bell Telephone Co. and Philadelphia…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Abramson v. Commonwealth, Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Brinks, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Borough of Platea v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Appeal of Mobilfone of Northeastern Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
3Cited by4 opinions
- J.A.M. Cab Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Carbonaire Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Hoskins Taxi Service, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985