Legal Opinion
Hughes v. Abell
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 20, 2009No. Civil Action 09-220 (JDB)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff George R. Hughes brings this action against Wells Fargo Bank (“Wells Fargo”) alleging violations of the D.C. Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“CPPA”) and seeking to quiet title to his primary residence after refinancing his mortgage. 1 Hughes alleges that Wells Fargo provided him financing on unconscionable terms and misrepresented material facts. Now before the Court is Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). For the reasons discussed below, Wells Fargo’s motion will be…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Grayson v. AT & T CORP.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Ihebereme v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Baird v. SnowbargerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Hutchinson v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Robinson v. Deutsche Bank National Trust CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.