Haney v. Noble
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
This controversy arose out of an automobile accident. The appellee R. R. Noble accompanied by his wife, appellee Louise Noble, had stopped their pickup truck at the entrance to an intersection when their vehicle was struck from the rear by an automobile driven by appellant. A jury awarded Louise Noble $15,000 and R. R. Noble $2,000.
Appellant first contends for reversal of the judgment that the evidence is insufficient to support the amount of damages awarded appellees. It is an often stated rule of this court that on appeal the evidence will be viewed most favorably to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blissett v. FrisbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. WarenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
- Belford v. HumphreySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Long v. HendersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Dyer v. PayneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Johnson v. Wells Fargo BankDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2014
- Bill Davis Trucking, Inc. v. PrysockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Honeycutt v. WaldenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Williams v. GatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Gross & Janes Co. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.