Legal Opinion

Gross & Janes Co. v. Brooks

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 12, 2012No. CA 12-139PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge.

| T Charles Harris and his employer, Gross & Janes Co. (collectively, Gross), appeal from a jury verdict awarding appel-lee Cedric Brooks damages for injuries he suffered in an automobile accident. In four points, Gross argues that the circuit court erred in allowing the introduction of certain evidence concerning Brooks’s claims for future medical expenses, loss of earning capacity, and his need for in-home-care expenses, in denying its motion for directed verdict on those claims, and in instructing the jury on those claims. We affirm.

On September 11, 2006, Harris was…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Edwards v. StillsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Bochar v. J. B. Martin Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Arthur v. ZearleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  5. Blissett v. FrisbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tadlock v. MoncusCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  2. Garrison v. HodgeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  3. Gartman v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  4. Harral v. McGahaCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  5. Dobbs v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API