Legal Opinion

Williams v. Gates

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 29, 1982No. 81-245PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

This appeal results from a jury’s finding that the appellants were liable for injuries received by appellees as a result of a traffic accident. Appellee Kinerd Gates was awarded $25,000 damages and his wife, appellee Christine Gates, was awarded $5,000 for loss of consortium. Appellants first contend that the court erred in excluding the proffered testimony of the investigating officer regarding similar automobile accidents in the near vicinity within the general time frame.

According to Gates, on January 19,1979, he was driving his pickup truck when a vehicle ahead of him…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  2. Little Rock Gas & Fuel Co. v. CoppedgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  3. Belford v. HumphreySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. HeyligersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  5. Haney v. NobleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Arthur v. ZearleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Willson Safety Products v. EschenbrennerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Bill Davis Trucking, Inc. v. PrysockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Honeycutt v. WaldenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API