Legal Opinion

Honeycutt v. Walden

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 1, 1988No. 87-254PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

This is a tort case, giving this court jurisdiction under Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 29(l)(o). Jill Walden sued Jerry Honeycutt for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle collision with Honeycutt. The case was tried to a jury and a verdict for the plaintiff was returned for $32,500 in compensatory damages and $12,000 in punitive damages.

Jerry Honeycutt alleges three points for reversal: it was error to submit the issue of punitive damages to the jury; it was error to include element No. 2 of AMI 2201 (the present value of any loss of ability to earn in the future); and it was error…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mo. Pac. Trans. Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  2. Holmes v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  3. Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  4. Miller v. BlantonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  5. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. DysartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Metro-North Commuter Railroad v. BuckleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. B & F ENGINEERING, INC. v. CotroneoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. v. DossSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Gipson v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API