Romero v. People
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rice
¶1 This ease requires us to address two issues we recently addressed in two other cases, People v. Jefferson, 2017 CO 35, 393 P.3d 493, and Venalonzo v. People, 2017 CO 9, 388 P.3d 868. Specifically, we must resolve whether (1) a trial court commits plain error when it fails to limit, sua sponte, a jury’s access to recorded statements during jury deliberations and (2) a trial court abuses its discretion when it allows a police officer to testify as a lay witness about the concept of grooming in the context of sexual predation. 1 We hold that (1) a trial court does not commit plain error when…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Hagos v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- People v. StewartSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- United States v. HittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Larry M. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. GarrisonColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
- v. AbadColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
- Campbell v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- People v. KubuuguSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- v. WamboltColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.