Hagos v. People
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
T1 In this postconviction proceeding, we address whether a determination on direct appeal that instructional error did not constitute plain error necessarily requires a determination in postconviction proceedings that trial counsel's failure to object to the erroneous instruction did not prejudice the defense. We conclude that a determination that instructional error did not constitute plain error does not control a determination of prejudice under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 684-86, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), because the two standards are not the same. The plain error…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by261 opinions
- People v. RandolphMichigan Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. RedigerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
- Abarca v. People No. 13SC750, Hill v. People No. 14SC3, Medrano-Bustamante v. People No. 14SC7, People v. SmootsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
- People v. PollardColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- Scott v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
256 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.