Legal Opinion

United States v. Hitt

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 15, 2006No. 05-30835PublishedCited by 135 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge:

Scott Hitt and William Causey appeal their convictions for violating the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2422-23, raising various points of error. For the following reasons, we affirm both Hitt’s conviction and Cau-sey’s conviction.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Scott Hitt and William Causey were indicted on three counts of violating the Mann Act, which criminalizes transporting a minor child across state lines for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual activity. 1 At trial, evidence was introduced that Hitt and Causey, who were together in a homosexual relationship for a…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by135 opinions

  1. People v. VaughnMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. United States v. LarsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. State v. NdinaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Chavez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  5. United States v. BansalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011

130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API