United States v. Hitt
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge:
Scott Hitt and William Causey appeal their convictions for violating the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2422-23, raising various points of error. For the following reasons, we affirm both Hitt’s conviction and Cau-sey’s conviction.
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Scott Hitt and William Causey were indicted on three counts of violating the Mann Act, which criminalizes transporting a minor child across state lines for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual activity. 1 At trial, evidence was introduced that Hitt and Causey, who were together in a homosexual relationship for a…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by135 opinions
- People v. VaughnMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- United States v. LarsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- State v. NdinaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Chavez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- United States v. BansalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.