Legal Opinion

Campbell v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 24, 2019No. Supreme Court Case No. 16SC267PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE GABRIEL delivered the Opinion of the Court.

¶1 This case requires us to decide whether the trial court abused its discretion in permitting a police officer to testify regarding the results of a Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus ("HGN") test without first qualifying that officer as an expert witness under CRE 702 and Venalonzo v. People , 2017 CO 9, 388 P.3d 868.1

¶2 We conclude that, on the facts of this case, the officer's testimony concerning the HGN test was expert testimony under CRE 702 and that the district court therefore erred in holding otherwise. We further conclude, however, that on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hagos v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  2. People v. StewartSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  3. Tevlin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  4. Venalonzo v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  5. People v. RamosSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
  2. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
  3. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Elmo Jesse JOHNSONSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
  4. Maria Reservoir Co. v. WarnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API