Legal Opinion

Bansal v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 10, 2025No. 3:23-cv-05527Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 RAKESH BANSAL, et al., Case No. 23-cv-05527-LB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY 13 v. JUDGMENT 14 NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE Re: ECF No. 53 COMPANY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 In this insurance-coverage action, the parties dispute whether defendant Nationwide Mutual 19 Insurance Company paid full insurance benefits to the plaintiffs, Rakesh and Hema Bansal, after a 20 water accident damaged their home. Nationwide ultimately paid the cost of repairs after a 21…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Oasis West Realty v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. MacKinnon v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API