Legal Opinion

Farah Manufacturing Co. v. Continental Airlines, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 18, 1975No. 6419PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PRESLAR, Chief Justice.

This is a suit by a shipper against the initiating carrier and the connecting carrier for loss of a shipment of air freight. The trial court granted the defendant-carriers’ motion for summary judgment because the plaintiff-shipper had not filed its claim within the time provided by the air freight tariffs. We are of the opinion that the summary judgment should be reversed.

Appellant Farah delivered to Appellee Continental Airlines at El Paso, Texas, a shipment of slacks for delivery to Bamber-gers in Newark, New Jersey. Appellee Braniff was a connecting carrier.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McBrideTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Hopper Paper Co. v. Baltimore & O.R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  3. East Texas Motor Freight Lines v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  4. Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. Henderson v. NitschkeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Holmquist v. Occidental Life Insurance Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Artim Transportation System, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Canberra Industries, Inc. v. Braniff InternationalCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Kelly Associates, Ltd. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Kelly Associates, Ltd. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API