Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Artim Transportation System, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Presiding Judge.
Bethlehem Steel Corporation appeals the summary judgment entered in favor of Ar-tim Transportation System, Inc. In essence, the sole issue raised is whether a provision contained in the bill of lading requiring notice of a claim within nine months of a loss may be circumvented under the circumstances of this case.
The facts are undisputed. On October 11, 1978 two coils of steel sheets were accepted for transport by Artim. The coils were accepted at the plant of Roll Coater, Inc. located in Kingsbury, Indiana. The coils were destined for the Ford Motor Company in Walton…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Sola Electric Co. v. Jefferson Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. StarbirdSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Lone Star Package Car Co., Inc. v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Haimbaugh Landscaping, Inc. v. JegenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Rio Grande Motor Way, Inc. v. Resort Graphics, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987