East Texas Motor Freight Lines v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Circuit Judge.
The question here presented is whether the requirement in an interstate bill of lading that claims of damage must be filed in writing with the carrier within nine months 1 is valid and whether it is rendered inoperative when the carrier acquired from other sources knowledge that the shipment was damaged. Appel-lee, the United States, was awarded judgment against appellant, East Texas Motor Freight Lines, for damages to an interstate shipment of machinery, the District Court holding upon stipulated facts that the “bill of lading notice in writing was unnecessary * * * if…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Southern Railway Co. v. PrescottSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. StarbirdSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- General Electric Company, and Third-Party v. Kelly C. Moretz, and Mason & Dixon Lines, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Wisconsin Packing Co., Inc. v. Indiana Refrigerator Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Perini-North River Associates, a Corporation v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company and Penn Central Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Thayer v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Primary Industries Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.