Legal Opinion

Sharrar v. Nestle

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1923No. Docket No. 79PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Gratiot; Moinet (Edward J.), J. ■Assumpsit by George E. Sharrar and Charles E. Watson, copartners as Sharrar & Watson, against Robert F. Nestle and another for commissions on the sale of a farm. Judgment for defendants on a directed verdict. Plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The plaintiffs brought this action to recover a broker’s commission for the sale of defendants’ farm. In the spring of 1920 the plaintiff firm had in their employ a salesman, Mr. Mann, who obtained from the defendants Exhibit A, which is spoken of as a listing contract, which gave to the plaintiffs such rights as they possessed to sell the farm. It was the claim of the defendant that this contract was not to be effective for 30 days, and was not to be effective at all if during the 30 days defendant notified the plaintiffs he did not desire to sell the farm, and that he gave them such notice…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gannon v. StansfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Hannan v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Siewek v. F. Joseph Lamb Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Henry Broderick, Inc. v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Fraser v. Collier Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Cherry v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  5. Sterk & Vogel, Inc. v. KuzeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API