Legal Opinion
Tulchinsky v. Public Service Mutual Casualty Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 1, 1935PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff sued to recover damages for loss of her infant child’s services and for incidental expenses, arising by reason of personal injuries suffered by the child from a taxicab owned by one Danishefsky. Having recovered a judgment for $2,500 against Danishefsky which she was unable to collect, plaintiff sued the defendant, the insurer. The defendant contests the claim upon the ground that it is not liable under section 17 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. The matter is submitted upon an agreed statement of facts, pursuant to sections 546 and 548 of the Civil Practice Act.
The insurance policy…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Psota v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Brustein v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Floyd v. Consolidated Indemnity & InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Price v. National Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Price v. National Surety CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mull v. Colt Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Matter of LynnUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1981
- Roche v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Millar v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.