Millar v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtSears, P. J.
The four judgments appealed from are recoveries by the plaintiffs as statutory beneficiaries under the provisions of section 109 of the Insurance Law under a policy of casualty insurance issued by the defendant to Albert Kauffman. The plaintiffs Margaret Millar and Belle L. Becker were, during the afternoon of January 20, 1928, riding as passengers in an automobile driven by the plaintiff Walter S. Becker, the owner of the car, when a collision occurred between the Becker automobile and the automobile of Albert Kauffman. Margaret Millar and Belle L. Becker received bodily injuries. Separate…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brustein v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Goldstein v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Goldstein v. . New York Life Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Pendergast v. Globe & Rutgers Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Tulchinsky v. Public Service Mutual Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Affiliated FM Ins. v. Kushner CompaniesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Oster v. RileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Carroll v. Preferred Risk InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Scarburgh Co. v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1979
- 128 Hester LLC v. New York Marine & General InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.