Legal Opinion

Layland v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided August 31, 2004No. 09-03-359 CRPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

A jury found April Michelle Layland to be guilty of the misdemeanor offense of driving while intoxicated. The trial court assessed punishment at 180 days in jail, probated for eighteen months, and a $500 fíne. In two points of error, Layland appeals the pre-trial ruling on her motion to suppress and challenges the legal sufficiency of the evidence supporting her conviction. For reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Point of error one contends the trial court erred when it overruled her motion to suppress statements made by the defendant. We apply a bifurcated…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by31 opinions

  1. Kevin DWayne Kennemur v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008
  2. Donald F. Huff v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
  3. State v. Rudd, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  4. Scillitani v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  5. Michael Channing McCann v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API