Legal Opinion

State v. Rudd

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided July 2, 2008No. 10-07-00216-CRPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELIPE REYNA, Justice.

The State appeals an order granting Earl Cody Rudd’s motion to suppress evidence related to his arrest for driving while intoxicated and his motion to exclude the arresting officer’s testimony regarding Rudd’s performance on the horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN) test. The State contends in three issues that the court erred by ruling: (1) “that a police officer may not lawfully question a witness to an accident unless the officer has reasonable suspicion to believe that person has also committed an offense”; (2) “that an officer has no probable cause to arrest a…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Amador v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. State v. KellyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  4. Wiede v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  5. Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Banda v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  2. Hall v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  3. Hennessy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  4. Bravito Gonzales v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2014
  5. Campos, ChristopherTexas Supreme Court · 2015

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API