Legal Opinion

People v. . Bowen

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 30, 1905PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered October 24, 1904, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered October 24, 1904, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying a motion for a new trial. This action was brought to recover a penalty of $100 alleged to have been incurred by the defendant in that on the 13th of August, 1902, he “ did offer and expose for sale three cans of milk ” which was adulterated and did contain a foreign substance, to wit, formaldehyde as a preservative.” There was neither allegation nor proof…

1Opinion of the CourtVann, J.

The Agricultural Law provides that the term “adulterated milk” means milk containing more than 88'per centum of water or fluids, or less than 12 per centum of milk solids, or less than three per centum of fats, or “ milk which has been diluted with water or any other fluid, or to which has been added or into which has been introduced any foreign substance whatever.” The term also includes milk drawn from cows within a stated period before or after parturition, or from those fed on certain kinds of food, or kept in unhealthy places,, as well as milk from which any part of the cream has been…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. . WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. People v. . KiblerNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. People v. . ArensbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. People Ex Rel. Lieberman v. . VandecarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. People v. . GirardNew York Court of Appeals · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Hutchinson Ice Cream Co. v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. State v. Hutchinson Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  4. Triangle Candy Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  5. People v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API