Legal Opinion
Triangle Candy Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 8, 1944No. 10406PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by defendants and appellants, Triangle Candy Company, a corporation, and Bernard G. Kennepohl, from judgments rendered against them after appellants were found guilty on six counts of violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C.A. § 331(a) prohibiting “the introduction into or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of any food, drug, device or cosmetic that is adulterated or misbranded.”
There were seven counts in the information. The adulteration charge was twofold in character in all but the first count. Alleged in each…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- French v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Lyon v. AlleySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Erhardt v. SchroederSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Bannister v. Dept. of StreetsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- Mister Ralpho v. J. Raymond Bell, Chairman, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Sanders v. Dept. of Health & Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- United States v. Cassaro, Inc., and Salvatore CassaroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
- United States of America, Libellant-Appellant v. 1,500 Cases More or Less, Tomato PasteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.