Legal Opinion

People v. Ryan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1930PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdgcomb, J.

This action is brought to recover the penalty imposed by section 41 of the Agriculture and Markets Law (as amd. by Laws of 1926, chap. 55) of the State of New York, for the alleged violation by defendant of the provisions of section 70 of the same act (as amd. by Laws of 1928, chap. 51).

Section 70, so far as it relates to the case here under discussion, reads as follows: “No person shall hereafter "without the consent of the owner use, * * * any milk * * * bottle, * * * having the name or initials of the owner stamped, marked or fastened on such * * * bottle.”

Section 41 makes a violation of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. Camfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HumesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. The People v. . Simeon DraperNew York Court of Appeals · 1857

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. In re the Estate of ShupackNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  3. Muller v. MullerNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Weinstock v. LadiskyNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Associated Dairies v. FletcherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API