Legal Opinion

Lisa Pedersen v. Bio-Medical Applications

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 6, 2015No. 14-1284PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYE, Circuit Judge.

Lisa Pedersen sued Bio-Medical Applications of Minnesota (BMA) under the Minnesota Whistleblower Act (MWA), Minnesota Statute § 181.932, alleging BMA took adverse employment actions against her after she reported the mishandling of blood samples and a cover-up by management. The district court 1 granted Bio-Medical’s motion for summary judgment, concluding Pedersen failed to establish a prima facie case under the MWA. Pedersen appeals, and we affirm.

I

Pedersen began working for BMA, which operates dialysis climes throughout Minnesota for individuals suffering from end stage…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. DAVID GRIFFITH, PLAINTIFF—APPELLANT v. CITY OF DES MOINES, DEFENDANTS—APPELLEESCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  4. Linda Green v. Franklin National Bank of Minneapolis, Doing Business as Franklin BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  5. Tamrat Tademe v. Saint Cloud State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Jane Doe v. Dardanelle School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  2. Alaa E. Elkharwily, M.D. v. Mayo Holding CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  3. Isis Naguib v. Trimark Hotel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  4. Gustafson v. Genesco, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2018
  5. Jonathan Scarborough v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API