Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Davidson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1990No. 88-1769, 88-1854PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

The plaintiffs in these consolidated cases were involved in auto accidents where the negligent party had insufficient insurance to cover the damages. Prior to the accidents, both plaintiffs had obtained insurance coverage from State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), but each lacked underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage. We accepted certification to determine whether an insurance agent owes an affirmative duty to advise its insureds of the availability or advisability of underin-sured motorist (UIM) coverage. We conclude that absent special circumstances they do not. We…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Rieck v. Medical Protective Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Dumer v. St. Michael's HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Waube v. WarringtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Mullins v. Commonwealth Life Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Rockweit v. SenecalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Mladineo v. SchmidtMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Sprangers v. Greatway Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Harts v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API